Paper detail

Surface embedding of $(n,k)$-extendable graphs

This paper is concerned with the surface embedding of matching extendable graphs. There are two directions extending the theory of perfect matchings, that is, matching extendability and factor-criticality. In solving a problem posed by Plummer, Dean (The matching extendability of surfaces, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 54 (1992), 133--141) established the fascinating formula for the minimum number $k= μ(Σ) $ such that every $Σ$-embeddable graph is not $k$-extendable. Su and Zhang, Plummer and Zha found the minimum number $n=ρ(Σ)$ such that every $Σ$-embeddable graph is not $n$-factor-critical. Based on the notion of $(n,k)$-graphs which associates these two parameters, we found the formula for the minimum number $k=μ(n,Σ)$ such that every $Σ$-embeddable graph is not an $(n,k)$-graph. To access this two-parameter-problem, we consider its dual problem and find out $μ(n,Σ)$ conversely. The same approach works for rediscovering the formula of the number $ρ(Σ)$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.