Paper detail

Surface convection and red giants radii measurements

The phenomenological models of convection use characteristic length scales they do not determine but that are chosen to fit solar or stellar observations. We investigate if changes of these length scales are required between the Sun and low mass stars on the red giant branch (RGB). The question is addressed jointly in the frameworks of the mixing length theory and of the full spectrum of turbulence model. For both models, the convective length scale is assumed to be a fixed fraction of the local pressure scale height. We use constraints coming from the observed effective temperatures and linear radii independently. We rely on a sample of 38 nearby giants and subgiants for which surface temperatures and luminosities are known accurately and the radii are determined through interferometry to better than 10%. For the few cases where the stellar masses were determined by asteroseismological measurements, we computed dedicated models. First we calibrate the solar models. Then, with the same physics, we compute RGB models for masses between 0.9 Mo and 2.5 Mo and metallicities ranging from $\rm [Fe/H]=-0.34$ to solar. The evolution is followed up to 1000 Lo. A special attention is given to the opacities and to the non grey atmosphere models used as boundary conditions for which the model of convection is the same as in the interior. We find that for both the mixing length theory and the full spectrum of turbulence model the characteristic solar length scale for convection has to be slightly reduced to fit the lower edge of the observed RGB. The corresponding models also better match the expected mass distribution on the RGB and are in better agreement to the seismic constraints. These results are robust whether effective temperatures determined spectroscopically or radii determined interferometrically are used.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.