Paper detail

Surface Brightness and Intrinsic Luminosity of Ellipticals

{Abridged} We show that the surface brightness (SB) profiles of elliptical galaxies can be parametrized using a linear superposition of 2-3 components, described by functions developed in Dhar & Williams as the 2D projections of a 3D Einasto profile. For a sample of 23 ellipticals with -24 < Mv < -15, our multi-component models span a range of up to 10^6 in SB and 10^5 in radius, have a median rms of 0.032 mag arcsec^-2, and are statistically justified at >3σ. Our models indicate that i) the central component is more concentrated than the outer component; and ii) the central component of 'core' galaxies is much more luminous, extended and concentrated than that of 'cuspy' galaxies, with their near exponential central profiles indicating disk-like systems whose existence must be verified spectroscopically. While such central excess components are not necessarily contrary to the notion of a mass deficit in 'core' galaxies, we show that the existence, amount, radial extent and sign of mass deficits disagree substantially in the literature, both for a given galaxy and on an average over a sample. We discuss possible implications and suggest that SMBH binaries are unlikely to be the sole mechanism for producing the large 'cores'. We also deduce conditions under which the 3D light density can be described with a multi-component Einasto model for both cuspy and core galaxies; indicating an universality in the functional form of the 3D density of light in galaxies and dark matter in LCDM N-body haloes. Finally, we show that our result - the outer component of the SB profiles of massive galaxies has 5 < n < 8 - could imply i) a common feature of collisionless systems; and ii) that galaxies with such n for their outer component are dark matter dominated.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.