Paper detail

Supremum-norm a posteriori error control of quadratic discontinuous Galerkin methods for the obstacle problem

We perform a posteriori error analysis in the supremum norm for the quadratic discontinuous Galerkin method for the elliptic obstacle problem. We define two discrete sets (motivated by Gaddam, Gudi and Kamana [1]), one set having integral constraints and other one with the nodal constraints at the quadrature points, and discuss the pointwise reliability and efficiency of the proposed a posteriori error estimator. In the analysis, we employ a linear averaging function to transfer DG finite element space to standard conforming finite element space and exploit the sharp bounds on the Green's function of the Poisson's problem. Moreover, the upper and the lower barrier functions corresponding to continuous solution u are constructed by modifying the conforming part of the discrete solution uh appropriately. Finally, numerical experiments are presented to complement the theoretical results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.