Paper detail

Suprathermal Proton Spectra at Interplanetary Shocks in Hybrid Simulations

Interplanetary shocks are one of the proposed sources of suprathermal ion populations (i.e., ions with energies of a few times the solar wind energy). Here, we present results from a series of three-dimensional hybrid simulations of collisionless shocks in the solar wind. We focus on the influence of the shock-normal angle, $θ_{Bn}$, and the shock speed, $V_s$, on producing protons with energies a few to hundreds of times the thermal energy of the upstream plasma. The combined effects of $θ_{Bn}$ and $V_s$ result in shocks with Alfvén Mach numbers in the range 3.0 to 6.0 and fast magnetosonic Mach numbers in the range 2.5 to 5.0, representing moderate to strong interplanetary shocks. We find that $θ_{Bn}$ largely organizes the shape of proton energy spectra while shock speed controls acceleration efficiency. All shocks accelerate protons at the shock front but the spectral evolution depends on $θ_{Bn}$. Shocks with $θ_{Bn} \geq 60^\circ$ produce isolated bursts of suprathermal protons at the shock front while shocks with $θ_{Bn} \leq 45^\circ$ create suprathermal beams upstream of the shock. Downstream proton energy spectra have exponential or smoothed broken power-law forms when $θ_{Bn} \geq 45^\circ$, and a single power-law form when $θ_{Bn} \leq 30^\circ$. Protons downstream of the strongest shocks have energies at least 100 times the upstream thermal energy, with $θ_{Bn} \leq 30^\circ$ shocks producing the highest energy protons and $θ_{Bn} \geq 60^\circ$ shocks producing the largest number of protons with energies at least a few times the thermal energy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.