Paper detail

Suppression of superconducting parameters by correlated quasi-two-dimensional magnetic fluctuations

We consider a clean layered magnetic superconductor in which a continuous magnetic transition takes place inside superconducting state and the exchange interaction between superconducting and magnetic subsystems is weak so that superconductivity is not destroyed at the magnetic transition. An example of such material is RbEuFe$_{4}$As$_{4}$. We investigate the suppression of the superconducting gap and superfluid density by correlated magnetic fluctuations in the vicinity of the magnetic transition. The influence of nonuniform exchange field on superconducting parameters is sensitive to the relation between the magnetic correlation length, $ξ_{h}$, and superconducting coherence length $ξ_{s}$ defining the &#39;scattering&#39; ($ξ_{h}<ξ_{s}$) and &#39;smooth&#39; ($ξ_{h}>ξ_{s}$) regimes. As a small uniform exchange field does not affect the superconducting gap and superfluid density at zero temperature, smoothening of the spatial variations of the exchange field reduces its effects on these parameters. We develop a quantitative description of this &#39;scattering-to-smooth&#39; crossover for the case of quasi-two-dimensional magnetic fluctuations. Since the magnetic-scattering probability varies at the energy scale comparable with the gap, the quasiclassical approximation is not applicable in the crossover region and microscopic treatment is required. We find that the corrections to both the gap and superfluid density grow proportionally to $ξ_{h}$ until it remains much smaller than $ξ_{s}$. When $ξ_{h}$ exceeds $ξ_{s}$, both parameters have much weaker dependence on $ξ_{h}$. Moreover, the gap correction may decrease with increasing of $ξ_{h}$ in the vicinity of the magnetic transition. We also find that the crossover is unexpectedly broad: the standard scattering approximation becomes sufficient only when $ξ_{h}$ is substantially smaller than $ξ_{s}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.