Paper detail

Supports, regularity, and $\boxplus$-infinite divisibility for measures of the form $(μ^{\boxplus p})^{\uplus q}$

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be the set of Borel probability measures on $\mathbb{R}$. We denote by $μ^{\mathrm{ac}}$ the absolutely continuous part of $μ\in\mathcal{M}$. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the supports and regularity for measures of the form $(μ^{\boxplus p})^{\uplus q}$, $μ\in\mathcal{M}$, where $\boxplus$ and $\uplus$ are the operations of free additive and Boolean convolution on $\mathcal{M}$, respectively, and $p\geq1$, $q>0$. We show that for any $q$ the supports of $((μ^{\boxplus p})^{\uplus q})^{\mathrm{ac}}$ and $(μ^{\boxplus p})^{\mathrm{ac}}$ contain the same number of components and this number is a decreasing function of $p$. Explicit formulas for the densities of $((μ^{\boxplus p})^{\uplus q})^{\mathrm{ac}}$ and criteria for determining the atoms of $(μ^{\boxplus p})^{\uplus q}$ are given. Based on the subordination functions of free convolution powers, we give another point of view to analyze the set of $\boxplus$-infinitely divisible measures and provide explicit expressions for their Voiculescu transforms in terms of free and Boolean convolutions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.