Paper detail

Supporting tangible multi-factor key exchange in households

A common approach to securing end-to-end connectivity between devices on the Internet is to utilise a cloud-based intermediary. With this reliance upon a third-party comes a set of security and privacy concerns that are difficult to mitigate. A promising new protocol, Wireguard, dispenses with the middleman to provide secure peer-to-peer communication. However, support for initial key exchange falls outside Wireguard's scope, making it potentially vulnerable to insecure out-of-band key exchange. The design of secure and usable key exchange methods is challenging, not least in domestic spaces, as they're often characterised by technically naive users in multi-occupancy environments, making them susceptible to insider and passer-by attacks (i.e.: theft, observation attacks, relay and impersonation attacks). We describe and present the results from a design ideation study that probes the use of tangible, multi-factor approaches for securing key exchange in domestic spaces. The study suggests that a home's semi-fixed features (e.g.: lamps, shelves, chairs) can be instrumented to support a promising three-factor authentication approach ('what you have, what you know and where you are') to enable key exchange solutions that are i. more secure than commonly used naive approaches and ii. desirable for end users.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.