Paper detail

Supervised Penalized Canonical Correlation Analysis

The canonical correlation analysis (CCA) is commonly used to analyze data sets with paired data, e.g. measurements of gene expression and metabolomic intensities of the same experiments. This allows to find interesting relationships between the data sets, e.g. they can be assigned to biological processes. However, it can be difficult to interpret the processes and often the relationships observed are not related to the experimental design but to some unknown parameters. Here we present an extension of the penalized CCA, the supervised penalized approach (spCCA), where the experimental design is used as a third data set and the correlation of the biological data sets with the design data set is maximized to find interpretable and meaningful canonical variables. The spCCA was successfully tested on a data set of Arabidopsis thaliana with gene expression and metabolite intensity measurements and resulted in eight significant canonical variables and their interpretation. We provide an R-package under the GPL license.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.