Paper detail

Supersonic Cloud Collision-II

In this second paper of the sequel of two papers, we further investigate the problem of molecular cloud (MC) collision. Anathpindika (2009) (hereafter paper I) considered highly supersonic cloud collisions and examined the effect of bending and shearing instabilities on the shocked gas slab. We now consider moderately supersonic cloud collisions (precollision cloud velocities of order 1.2 km s$^{-1}$ to 2.4 km s$^{-1}$). In the current paper, we present five SPH simulations of fast head-on and/or off-centre cloud collisions to study the evolution of ram pressure confined gas slabs. The relevant thermodynamics in the problem is simplified by adopting a simple barytropic equation of state. We explore the parameter space by varying the pre-collision velocity and the temperature of the post collision gas slab. The temperature in a pressure compressed gas slab is crucial to its dynamical evolution. The pressure confined gas slabs become Jeans unstable if the average sound crossing time, $t_{cr}$, of putative clumps condensing out of them, is much larger than their free fall time, $t_{ff}$. Self gravitating clumps may spawn multiple/larger $N$-body star clusters. Warmer gas slabs are unlikely to fragment and may end up as diffuse gas clouds.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.