Paper detail

Supernova Remnants as a Probe of Dust Grains in the Interstellar Medium

Interstellar dust grains play a crucial role in the evolution of the galactic interstellar medium (ISM). Despite its importance, however, dust remains poorly understood in terms of its origin, composition, and abundance throughout the universe. Supernova remnants (SNRs) provide a laboratory for studying the evolution of dust grains, as they are one of the only environments in the universe where it is possible to observe grains being both created and destroyed. SNRs exhibit collisionally heated dust, allowing dust to serve as a diagnostic both for grain physics and for the plasma conditions in the SNR. I present theoretical models of collisionally heated dust which calculate grain emission as well as destruction rates. In these models, I incorporate physics such as nonthermal sputtering caused by grain motions through the gas, a more realistic approach to sputtering for small grains, and arbitrary grain compositions porous and composite grains. I apply these models to infrared and X-ray observations of Kepler's supernova and the Cygnus Loop in the galaxy, and SNRs 0509-67.5, 0519-69.0, and 0540-69.3 in the LMC. X-ray observations characterize the hot plasma while IR observations constrain grain properties and destruction rates. Such a multi-wavelength approach is crucial for a complete understanding of gas and dust interaction and evolution. Modeling of both X-ray and IR spectra allows disentangling of parameters such as pre and postshock gas density, as well as swept-up masses of gas and dust, and can provide constraints on the shock compression ratio. Observations also show that the dust-to-gas mass ratio in the ISM is lower by a factor of several than what is inferred by extinction studies of starlight. Future observatories, such as the James Webb Space Telescope and the International X-ray Observatory, will allow testing of models far beyond what is possible now.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.