Paper detail

Supernova-regulated ISM: the effects of radiative cooling and thermal conductivity on the multi-phase structure

The hydrodynamic state of the interstellar medium (ISM) heated and randomly stirred by supernovae (SNe) is investigated. We use a three-dimensional non-ideal hydrodynamic ISM model in a domain extending 0.5 x 0.5 kpc horizontally and 2 kpc vertically to explore the relative importance of various physical and numerical effects on the multi-phase, turbulent ISM. We include both Type I and II SNe, the latter occurring only in dense regions. First we investigate the role of the thermal instability in the temperature range 300-6100 K, comparing results obtained for two different cooling functions, one susceptible to the instability, the other stable. The presence of thermal instability in the system is mainly visible as the tendency of the gas to avoid the relevant temperature range, as it quickly evolves towards either colder or warmer phases. Nevertheless, the formation of dense structures for both cooling functions appears to be dominated by expanding and colliding supernova remnants, rather than by the thermal instability. As we need to include a finite thermal conduction coefficient to resolve the thermal instability with our uniform grid, we also explore the effects of changing Prandtl number on the system. The purely divergent SN forcing is found to produce significant amounts of vorticity. The relative vorticity is around 0.6-0.7 for the highest Prandtl numbers explored, Pr=40, and is observed to diminish almost by a factor of two for the lowest Prandtl numbers studied, Pr=1. Rotation laws with angular velocity decreasing or increasing outwards are investigated, enabling us to separate the contributions to kinetic helicity due to rotation and shear. When angular velocity decreases outwards, these two contributions partly cancel each other, resulting in a smaller net helicity.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.