Paper detail

Supernova Neutrinos and the Tau-Neutrino Mass

We perform an extensive investigation of the sensitivity to non-vanishing tau-neutrino mass in a large water Cherenkov detector, developing an analysis method for neutrino events originated by a supernova explosion. This approach, based on directional considerations, provides informations almost undepending on the supernova model. We analyze several theoretical models from numerical simulations and phenomenological models based on SN1987A data, and determine optimal values of the analysis parameters so as to reach the highest sensitivity to a non-vanishing tau-neutrino mass. The minimal detectable mass is generally just above the cosmologically interesting range, m ~ 100 eV, in the case of a supernova explosion near the galactic center. For the case that no positive signal is obtained, observation of a neutrino burst with Super-Kamiokande will anyhow lower the present upper bound on tau-neutrino mass to few hundred eV.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.