Paper detail

Supernova 2000cb: high-energy version of SN 1987A

Among type IIP supernovae there are a few events that resemble the well-studied supernova 1987A produced by the blue supergiant in the Large Magellanic Cloud. We study a peculiar supernova 2000cb and compare it with the supernova 1987A. We carried out hydrodynamic simulations of the supernova in an extended parameter space to describe its light curve and spectroscopic data. The hydrogen H-alpha and H-beta lines are modeled using a time-dependent approach. We constructed the hydrodynamic model by fitting the photometric and spectroscopic observations. We infer a presupernova radius of 35 Rsun, an ejecta mass of 22.3 Msun, an explosion energy of 4.4x10^{51} erg, and a radioactive Ni-56 mass of 0.083 Msun. The estimated progenitor mass on the main sequence lies in the range of 24-28 Msun. The early H-alpha profile on day 7 is consistent with the density distribution found from hydrodynamic modeling, while the H-alpha line on day 40 indicates an extended Ni-56 mixing up to a velocity of 8400 km/s. We emphasize that the dome-like light curves of both supernova 2000cb and supernova 1987A are entirely powered by radioactive decay. This is unlike normal type IIP supernovae, the plateau of which is dominated by the internal energy deposited after the shock wave propagation through the presupernova. We find signatures of the explosion asymmetry in the photospheric and nebular spectra. The explosion energy of supernova 2000cb is higher by a factor of three compared to supernova 1987A, which poses a serious problem for explosion mechanisms of type IIP supernovae.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.