Supermassive Stars Match the Spectral Signatures of JWST's Little Red Dots

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Abstract

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has unveiled a population of enigmatic, compact sources at high redshift known as ``Little Red Dots'' (LRDs), whose physical nature remains a subject of intense debate. Concurrently, the rapid assembly of the first supermassive black holes (SMBHs) requires the formation of heavy seeds, for which supermassive stars (SMSs) are leading theoretical progenitors. In this work, we perform the first quantitative test of the hypothesis that LRDs are the direct observational manifestation of these primordial SMSs. We present a novel, first-principles pipeline generating synthetic spectra for a non-rotating, metal-free SMS up to 106 M⊙10^6 \, M_\odot. We establish that its luminosity (Lλ≈1.7×1044 erg s−1 μm−1L_λ\approx 1.7 \times 10^{44} \, \text{erg} \, \text{s}^{-1} \, μ\text{m}^{-1} at 4050\,Å) provides a decisive constraint, matching prominent LRDs. Our model self-consistently reproduces their defining spectral features: the V-shaped Balmer break morphology is shown to be an intrinsic photospheric effect, while the complex line phenomenology, strong Hββ in emission with other Balmer lines in absorption arises from non-LTE effects in a single stellar atmosphere. With wind and macroturbulent broadening, we match LRD spectra at z=7.76z=7.76 and z=3.55z=3.55, including the Hββ width of MoM-BH*-1 to within 4\%. We predict a luminosity-dependent observability window, ∼104\sim10^{4} yr for the most luminous systems and 10510^{5}--10610^{6} yr if Lλ(4050 A˚)L_λ(4050\,\textÅ) is lower by 1--2 dex. These results provide a self-consistent alternative to multi-component obscured AGN scenarios and suggest JWST may be witnessing luminous stages of SMBH progenitors before collapse.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.