Paper detail

Supermassive black holes and their host spheroids II. The red and blue sequence in the $M_{\rm BH} - M_{\rm *,sph}$ diagram

In our first paper, we performed a detailed (i.e. bulge, disks, bars, spiral arms, rings, halo, nucleus, etc.) decomposition of 66 galaxies, with directly measured black hole masses, $M_{BH}$, that had been imaged at $3.6~μm$ with Spitzer. Our sample is the largest to date and, for the first time, the decompositions were checked for consistency with the galaxy kinematics. We present correlations between $M_{ BH}$ and the host spheroid (and galaxy) luminosity, $L_{sph}$ (and $L_{gal}$), and also stellar mass, $M_{*,sph}$. While most previous studies have used galaxy samples that were overwhelmingly dominated by high-mass, early-type galaxies, our sample includes 17 spiral galaxies, half of which have $M_{BH} < 10^7~M_\odot$, and allows us to better investigate the poorly studied low-mass end of the $M_{BH} - M_{*,sph}$ correlation. The bulges of early-type galaxies follow $M_{BH} \propto M_{*,sph}^{1.04 \pm 0.10}$ and define a tight red sequence with intrinsic scatter $ε= 0.43 \pm 0.06~dex$ and a median $M_{BH}/M_{*,sph}$ ratio of $0.68 \pm 0.04\%$, i.e.~a $\pm 2σ$ range of 0.1-5%. At the low-mass end, the bulges of late-type galaxies define a much steeper blue sequence, with $M_{BH} \propto M_{*,sph}^{2-3}$, indicating that gas-rich processes feed the black hole more efficiently than the host bulge as they coevolve. We additionally report that: i) our Sersic galaxy sample follows a less steep sequence than previously reported; ii) bulges with Sersic index $n<2$, argued by some to be pseudo-bulges, are not offset to lower $M_{BH}$ from the correlation defined by the current bulge sample with $n>2$; and iii) $L_{sph}$ and $L_{gal}$ correlate equally well with $M_{BH}$, in terms of intrinsic scatter, only for early-type galaxies - once reasonable numbers of spiral galaxies are included, the correlation with $L_{ sph}$ is better than that with $L_{gal}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.