Paper detail

Supermassive Black Holes and Nuclear Star Clusters: Connection with the Host Galaxy Kinematics and Color

We consider the relationship between the masses of the central objects in disky galaxies - supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and nuclear star clusters (NCs) - and various parameters of parent galaxies: velocity of rotation $V_{(2)}$ at $R= 2$ kpc, maximal velocity of rotation $V_{\textrm{max}}$, the indicative dynamical mass $M_{25}$, the total mass of the stellar population $M_{*}$, and the total color index ($B{-}V$). The mass of nuclear clusters $M_{\rm nc}$ correlates more closely with the kinematic parameters and total mass of galaxies than the mass of central black holes $M_{\rm bh}$, including correlation with the velocity $V_{\textrm{max}}$, which characterizes the virial mass of the dark halo. On average, lenticular galaxies are distinguished by higher masses $M_{\rm bh}$ compared to other types of galaxies with similar characteristics. The dependence of masses of central objects on the color index is bimodal: galaxies of the red group (red-sequence), which have ($B{-}V) > 0.6{-}0.7$, being mostly early-type galaxies, differ from bluer galaxies, by higher values of $M_{\rm nc}$ and $M_{\rm bh}$. The red-group galaxies have systematically higher $M_{\rm bh}$ values, even when the host-galaxy parameters are similar. In contrast, in the case of nuclear stellar clusters, the "blue" and "red" galaxies form unified sequences at the diagrams. The results agree with scenarios in which most red-group galaxies form as a result of the partial or complete loss of interstellar gas in a stage of high nuclear activity in galaxies whose central black-hole mass exceeds $10^6 {-} 10^7 M_{\odot}$ (depending on the total mass of a galaxy). Most of galaxies with $M_{\rm bh}> 10^7 M_{\odot}$ are lenticular galaxies (types S0, E/S0), whose disks are usually devoid of gas.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.