Paper detail

Supermassive Black Hole Formation at High Redshifts Through a Primordial Magnetic Field

It has been proposed that primordial gas in early dark matter halos, with virial temperatures above 10^4 K, can avoid fragmentation and undergo rapid collapse, possibly resulting in a supermassive black hole (SMBH). This requires the gas to avoid cooling and to remain at temperatures near T=10^4 K. We show that this condition can be satisfied in the presence of a sufficiently strong primordial magnetic field, which heats the collapsing gas via ambipolar diffusion. If the field has a strength above B = 3.6 (comoving) nG, the collapsing gas is kept warm (T=10^4K) until it reaches the critical density n_crit=10^3 cm^{-3} at which the roto-vibrational states of H_2 approach local thermodynamic equilibrium. H_2-cooling then remains inefficient, and the gas temperature stays near 10^4K, even as it continues to collapse to higher densities. The critical magnetic field strength required to permanently suppress H_2-cooling is somewhat higher than upper limit of approx. 2 nG from the cosmic microwave background (CMB). However, it can be realized in the rare (2-3)-sigma regions of the spatially fluctuating B-field; these regions contain a sufficient number of halos to account for the z=6 quasar BHs.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.