Paper detail

Superhydrogenated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Molecules: Vibrational Spectra in the Infrared

Superhydrogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) may be present in H-rich and ultraviolet-poor benign regions. The addition of excess H atoms to PAHs converts the aromatic bonds into aliphatic bonds, the strongest of which falls near 3.4 $μ$m. Therefore, superhydrogenated PAHs are often hypothesized as a carrier of the 3.4 $μ$m emission feature which typically accompanies the stronger 3.3 $μ$m aromatic C--H stretching feature. To assess this hypothesis, we use density function theory to compute the IR vibrational spectra of superhydrogenated PAHs and their ions of various sizes (ranging from benzene, naphthalene to perylene and coronene) and of various degrees of hydrogenation (ranging from minimal hydrogenation to heavy hydrogenation). For each molecule, we derive the intrinsic oscillator strengths of the 3.3 $μ$m aromatic C--H stretch ($A_{3.3}$) and the 3.4 $μ$m aliphatic C--H stretch ($A_{3.4}$). By comparing the computationally-derived mean ratio of $\langle A_{3.4}/A_{3.3}\rangle\sim1.98$ with the mean ratio of the observed intensities $\langle I_{3.4}/I_{3.3}\rangle\sim0.12$, we find that the degree of superhydrogenation --- the fraction of C atoms attached with excess H atoms --- is only $\sim2.2\%$ for neutral PAHs which predominantly emit the 3.3 and 3.4 $μ$m features. We also determine for each molecule the intrinsic band strengths of the 6.2 $μ$m aromatic C--C stretch ($A_{6.2}$) and the 6.85 $μ$m aliphatic C--H deformation ($A_{6.85}$). We derive the degree of superhydrogenation from the mean ratio of the observed intensities $\langle I_{6.85}/I_{6.2}\rangle\sim0.10$ and $\langle A_{6.85}/A_{6.2}\rangle\sim1.53$ for neutrals and $\langle A_{6.85}/A_{6.2}\rangle\sim1.23$ for cations to be $\lesssim 3.1\%$ for neutrals and $\lesssim 8.6\%$ for cations. We conclude that astrophysical PAHs are primarily aromatic and are only marginally superhydrogenated.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.