Paper detail

Supergiant Pulses from Extragalactic Neutron Stars

We consider radio bursts that originate from extragalactic neutron stars (NSs) by addressing three questions about source distances. What are the physical limitations on coherent radiation at GHz frequencies? Do they permit detection at cosmological distances? How many bursts per NS are needed to produce the inferred burst rate $\sim 10^3$-$10^4 $sky$^{-1}$ day$^{-1}$? The burst rate is comparable to the NS formation rate in a Hubble volume, requiring only one per NS if they are bright enough. However, radiation physics causes us to favor a closer population. More bursts per NS are then required but repeats in 10 to 100 yr could still be negligible. Bursts are modeled as sub-ns, coherent shot pulses superposed incoherently to produce ms-duration $\sim 1$ Jy amplitudes; each shot-pulse can be much weaker than the burst amplitude, placing less restrictive requirements on the emission process. Nonetheless, single shot pulses are similar to the extreme, unresolved ($< 0.4$ ns) MJy shot pulse seen from the Crab pulsar, which is consistent with coherent curvature radiation emitted near the light cylinder by an almost neutral clump with net charge $\sim \pm 10^{21}e$ and total energy $\gtrsim 10^{23}$ ergs. Bursts from Gpc distances require incoherent superposition of $\sim 10^{12}d_{\rm Gpc}^2$ shot pulses or a total energy $\gtrsim 10^{35} d_{\rm Gpc}^2$ erg. The energy reservoir near the light cylinder limits the detection distance to $\lesssim {\rm few} \times 100$ Mpc for a fluence $\sim 1$ Jy ms unless conditions are more extreme than for the Crab pulsar. Similarly, extreme single pulses from ordinary pulsars and magnetars could be detectable from throughout the Local Group and perhaps farther. Contributions to dispersion measures from galaxy clusters will be significant for some of the bursts. We discuss tests for the signatures of bursts associated with extragalactic NSs.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.