Paper detail

Superdense and normal early-type galaxies at 1<z<2

We combined proprietary and archival HST observations to collect a sample of 62 early-type galaxies (ETGs) at 0.9<z<2 with spectroscopic confirmation of their redshift and spectral type. The whole sample is covered by ACS or NICMOS observations and partially by Spitzer and AKARI observations. We derived morphological parameters by fitting their HST light profiles and physical parameters by fitting their spectral energy distributions. The study of the size-mass and the size-luminosity relations of these early-types shows that a large fraction of them (~50) follows the local relations. These 'normal' ETGs are not smaller than local counterparts with comparable mass. The remaining half of the sample is composed of compact ETGs with sizes (densities) 2.5-3 (15-30) times smaller (higher) than local counterparts and, most importantly, than the other normal ETGs at the same redshift and with the same stellar mass. This suggests that normal and superdense ETGs at z~2 come from different histories of mass assembly.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.