Paper detail

Superconductivity model for a spin-vortex checkerboard

We introduce a microscopic model aimed at describing the behavior of fermionic excitations in the background of a magnetic texture called "spin-vortex checkerboard". This texture was proposed previously as a possible alternative to stripes to interpret the experimental phenomenology of spin and charge modulations in 1/8-doped lanthanum cuprates. The model involves two kinds of interacting fermionic excitations residing in spin-rich and spin-poor regions of the modulated structure. It is a generalization of another model developed earlier for the so-called "grid checkerboard". The principal terms of our model describe the decay of fermionic pairs belonging to spin-poor regions into single fermions occupying spin-rich regions and vice versa. These terms induce intricate fermionic correlations throughout the system but fall short of inducing superconductivity unless arbitrarily small hopping terms are added to the model Hamiltonian. We present the mean-field solution of the model, including, in particular, the temperature dependence of the energy gap. The latter is found to be in a good overall agreement with available experimental data for high-$T_c$ cuprate superconductors.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.