Paper detail

Superconductivity in Hf$_5$Sb$_3$$_-$$_x$Ru$_x$: Are Ru and Sb a critical charge-transfer pair for superconductivity?

We address the hypothesis that in intermetallic compounds, contrary to a long-standing view that considers electron count and crystal structure type as the only significant chemical criteria for the occurrence of superconductivity, consideration of the actual elements present is a third equally important factor. The importance of chemical identity may seem obvious, especially to chemists, but it has not previously been explicitly tested for intermetallic superconductors. Here we test the hypothesis by searching for and finding a new superconductor in the tetragonal symmetry Hf5Sb3-xMx solid solution. This phase is ideal for this study, because M can be many 3d, 4d and 5d transition metals in an M-Sb chain and is a minor elemental constituent. We find superconductivity for M = Ru only. This is the case even when the electron count can be adjusted to the same value with a different transition element within the same structure type. This leads us to propose that, like Cu-O (cuprate superconductors) and Fe-As (iron-pnictide superconductors) in different classes of compounds, Ru and Sb may be a critical element pair for superconductivity in intermetallic phases.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.