Paper detail

Superconductivity driven by the screening of long-distance Coulomb interaction

The pair-fluctuation contribution reduces the electrostatic screening length in superconductivity as compared to the normal state. When a conductor possesses a static background charge distribution, superconductivity arises even in the absence of an explicit pairing interaction, such that the Coulomb repulsion is reduced and the total energy is lowered. We demonstrate that the superconducting gap increases with increased background charge at first, after which the mixing of the Higgs and plasma modes suppresses superconductivity in the pseudogap phase. This indicates that the mechanism may be relevant to the cuprates and iron pnictides. When the background charge is identified with the incoherent component of optical conductivity in the cuprates, our results reproduce the shape, size and position of the superconducting dome with zero free parameters. A superconducting critical temperature of about 1000 K is possible in ion-doped conductors.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.