Paper detail

Superconducting phases in a two-component microscale model of neutron star cores

We identify the possible ground states for a mixture of two superfluid condensates (one neutral, the other electrically charged) using a phenomenological Ginzburg-Landau model. While this framework is applicable to any interacting condensed-matter mixture of a charged and a neutral component, we focus on nuclear matter in neutron star cores, where proton and neutron condensates are coupled via non-dissipative entrainment. We employ the Skyrme interaction to determine the neutron star's equilibrium composition, and hence obtain realistic coefficients for our Ginzburg-Landau model at each depth within the star's core. We then use the Ginzburg-Landau model to determine the ground state in the presence of a magnetic field. In this way, we obtain superconducting phase diagrams for six representative Skyrme models, revealing the microphysical magnetic flux distribution throughout the neutron star core. The phase diagrams are rather complex and the locations of most of the phase transitions can only be determined through numerical calculations. Nonetheless, we find that for all equations of state considered in this work, much of the outer core exhibits type-1.5 superconductivity, rather than type-II superconductivity as is generally assumed. For local magnetic field strengths $\lesssim 10^{14} \, {\rm G}$, the magnetic flux is distributed inhomogeneously, with bundles of magnetic fluxtubes separated by flux-free Meissner regions. We provide an approximate criterion to determine the transition between this type-1.5 phase and the type-I region in the inner core.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.