Paper detail

Superbubble dynamics in globular cluster infancy II. Consequences for secondary star formation in the context of self-enrichment via fast rotating massive stars

The self-enrichment scenario for globular clusters (GC) requires large amounts of residual gas after the initial formation of the first stellar generation. Recently, Krause et al. (2012) found that supernovae may not be able to expel that gas, as required to explain their present day gas-free state, and suggested that a sudden accretion on to the dark remnants, at a stage when type II supernovae have ceased, may plausibly lead to fast gas expulsion. Here, we explore the consequences of these results for the self-enrichment scenario via fast rotating massive stars (FRMS). We analyse the interaction of FRMS with the intra-cluster medium (ICM), in particular where, when and how the second generation of stars may form. From the results, we develop a timeline of the first approximately 40 Myr of GC evolution. The results of Paper I imply three phases during which the ICM is in a fundamentally different state, namely the wind bubble phase (lasting 3.5 to 8.8 Myr), the supernova phase (lasting 26.2 to 31.5 Myr), and the dark remnant accretion phase (lasting 0.1 to 4 Myr): (i) Quickly after the first generation massive stars have formed, stellar wind bubbles compress the ICM into thin filaments. No stars may form in the normal way during this phase, due to the high Lyman-Werner flux density. If the first generation massive stars have however equatorial ejections, as we proposed in the FRMS scenario, accretion may resume in the shadow of the equatorial ejecta. The second generation stars may then form due to gravitational instability in these discs that are fed by both the FRMS ejecta and pristine gas. [...]

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.