Paper detail

Super-Chandrasekhar SNe Ia Strongly Prefer Metal-Poor Environments

We discuss the emerging trend that super-Chandrasekhar Type Ia Supernovae (SCSNe) with progenitor mass estimates significantly exceeding 1.4 M_sun tend to explode in metal-poor environments. While Taubenberger et al. 2011 noted that some of the SCSNe host galaxies are relatively metal-poor, we focus quantitatively on their locations in the hosts to point out that in three out of four cases, the SCSNe explosions occurred in the outer edge of the disks of their hosts. It is therefore very likely that their progenitors had far lower metallicities than those implied by the metallicity of their hosts' central regions. In two cases (SN 2003fg and SN 2009dc) the explosion sites were outside 99% of the host's light, and in one case (SN 2006gz) the host's radial metallicity slope indicates that the explosion site is in a metal-poor region. The fourth case (SN 2007if) has the lowest spectroscopically measured SN Ia host metallicity (Childress et al. 2011. It may be possible to explain each of these unusually bright events through some progenitor scenario specific to that case, but a much simpler and straightforward conclusion would be to ascribe the controlling factor to the only physical aspect they have in common --- metal poor environments.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.