Paper detail

Sunflowers and Testing Triangle-Freeness of Functions

A function $f: \mathbb{F}_2^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ is triangle-free if there are no $x_1,x_2,x_3 \in \mathbb{F}_2^n$ satisfying $x_1+x_2+x_3=0$ and $f(x_1)=f(x_2)=f(x_3)=1$. In testing triangle-freeness, the goal is to distinguish with high probability triangle-free functions from those that are $\varepsilon$-far from being triangle-free. It was shown by Green that the query complexity of the canonical tester for the problem is upper bounded by a function that depends only on $\varepsilon$ (GAFA, 2005), however the best known upper bound is a tower type function of $1/\varepsilon$. The best known lower bound on the query complexity of the canonical tester is $1/\varepsilon^{13.239}$ (Fu and Kleinberg, RANDOM, 2014). In this work we introduce a new approach to proving lower bounds on the query complexity of triangle-freeness. We relate the problem to combinatorial questions on collections of vectors in $\mathbb{Z}_D^n$ and to sunflower conjectures studied by Alon, Shpilka, and Umans (Comput. Complex., 2013). The relations yield that a refutation of the Weak Sunflower Conjecture over $\mathbb{Z}_4$ implies a super-polynomial lower bound on the query complexity of the canonical tester for triangle-freeness. Our results are extended to testing $k$-cycle-freeness of functions with domain $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ for every $k \geq 3$ and a prime $p$. In addition, we generalize the lower bound of Fu and Kleinberg to $k$-cycle-freeness for $k \geq 4$ by generalizing the construction of uniquely solvable puzzles due to Coppersmith and Winograd (J. Symbolic Comput., 1990).

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.