Paper detail

Sum rules via large deviations: extension to polynomial potentials and the multi-cut regime

A sum rule is an identity connecting the entropy of a measure with coefficients involved in the construction of its orthogonal polynomials (Jacobi coefficients). Our paper is an extension of Gamboa, Nagel and Rouault (2016), where we have showed sum rules by using only probabilistic tools (namely the large deviations theory). Here, we prove large deviation principles for the weighted spectral measure of unitarily invariant random matrices in two general situations: firstly, when the equilibrium measure is not necessarily supported by a single interval and secondly, when the potential is a nonnegative polynomial. The rate functions can be expressed as functions of the Jacobi coefficients. These new large deviation results lead to original sum rules both for the one and the multi-cut regime and also answer a conjecture stated in Gamboa, Nagel and Rouault (2016) concerning general sum rules.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.