Paper detail

Suites of dwarfs around nearby giant galaxies

We consider a sample of the Updated Nearby Galaxy Catalog that contains eight hundred objects within 11 Mpc. Environment of each galaxy was characterized by a tidal index $Θ_1$ depending on the separation and mass of the galaxy's Main Disturber (=MD). We ascribed the UNGC galaxies with a common MD to its suite, and ranked suite members according to their $Θ_1$. All suite members with positive $Θ_1$ are assumed to be physical companions of the MD. The distribution of suites by the number of members, n, follows to a relation $N(n) \sim n^{-2}$. The twenty most populated suites contain 468 galaxies, i.e. 59% of the UNGC sample. About 58% of our sample are members of physical groups. The fraction of MDs among the brightest galaxies is almost 100% and drops to 50% at $M_B = -18^m$. We discuss various properties of MDs, as well as galaxies belonging to their suites. The suite abundance practically does not depend on morphological type, linear diameter or hydrogen mass of MD, revealing the tightest correlation with the MD dynamical mass. Dwarf galaxies around MDs exhibit well-known segregation effects: the members of outskirts have later morphological types, richer HI-contents and higher rates of star formation activity. Nevertheless, there are some intriguing cases when dwarf spheroidal galaxies occur at the far periphery of the suites, as well as some late-type dwarfs residing close to MDs. The multiplicity of nearby groups according to number of their physical members can be described by the Hirsh-like index $h_g = 9$, indicating that the Local Volume contains 9 groups with populations exceeding 9 members. (abridged)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.