Paper detail

Suite of Hydrodynamical Simulations for the Lyman-Alpha Forest with Massive Neutrinos

The signature left in quasar spectra by the presence of neutral hydrogen in the Universe allows one to constrain the sum of the neutrino masses with improved sensitivity, with respect to laboratory experiments, and may shed a new light on the neutrino mass hierarchy and on the absolute mass scale of neutrinos. Constraints on cosmological parameters and on the dark energy equation of state can also be derived, from a joint parameter estimation procedure. However, this requires a detailed modeling of the line-of-sight power spectrum of the transmitted flux in the Lyman-Alpha (LyA) forest on scales ranging from a few to hundreds of Mpcs, which in turns demands the inclusion and careful treatment of cosmological neutrinos. To this end, we present here a suite of state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulations with cold dark matter, baryons and massive neutrinos, specifically targeted for modeling the low-density regions of the IGM as probed by the LyA forest at high-redshift. The simulations span volumes ranging from (25 Mpc/h)^3 to (100 Mpc/h)^3, and are made using either 3 X 192^3~21 millions or 3 X 768^3~1.4 billion particles. The resolution of the various runs can be further enhanced, so that we can reach the equivalent of 3 X 3072^3~87 billion particles in a (100 Mpc/h)^3 box size. The chosen cosmological parameters are compatible with the latest Planck (2013) results, although we also explore the effect of slight variations in the main cosmological and astrophysical parameters. We adopt a particle-type implementation of massive neutrinos, and consider three degenerate species having masses M_nu =0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.8 eV, respectively. We improve on previous studies in several ways, in particular with updated routines for IGM radiative cooling and heating processes, and initial conditions based on 2LPT rather than the Zeldovich approximation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.