Paper detail

Suicide disparities across urban and suburban areas in the U.S.: A comparative assessment of socio-environmental factors using a data-driven predictive approach

Disparity in suicide rates between urban and suburban/rural areas is growing, with rural areas typically witnessing higher suicide rates in the U.S. However, previous studies often ignored the effect of socio-environmental factors on the suicide rates and its regional disparity. To address these gaps, we propose a holistic data-driven framework to model the associations of social (demographic, socioeconomic) and environmental (climate) factors on suicide rates, and study the disparities across urban and suburban areas. Leveraging the county-level suicide data from 2000--2017 along with the socio-environmental features, we trained, tested and validated a suite of advanced statistical learning algorithms to identify, assess and predict the influence of key socio-environmental factors on suicide rates. Random forest outperformed all other models in terms of goodness-of-fit and predictive accuracy, and selected as the final model to make inferences. Our results indicate that population demographics is significantly associated with both urban and suburban suicide rates. We found that suburban population is more vulnerable to suicides compared to urban communities, with suburban suicide rate being particularly sensitive to unemployment rate and median household income. Our analysis revealed that suicide mortality is correlated to climate, showing that urban suicide rate is more sensitive to higher temperatures, seasonal-heating-degree-days and precipitation, while suburban suicide rate is sensitive to only seasonal-cooling-degree-days. This work provides deeper insights on interactions between key socio-environmental factors and suicides across different urbanized areas, and can help the public health agencies develop suicide prevention strategies to reduce the growing risk of suicides.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.