Paper detail

Sufficient Conditions for Low-rank Matrix Recovery, Translated from Sparse Signal Recovery

The low-rank matrix recovery (LMR) is a rank minimization problem subject to linear equality constraints, and it arises in many fields such as signal and image processing, statistics, computer vision, system identification and control. This class of optimization problems is $\N¶$-hard and a popular approach replaces the rank function with the nuclear norm of the matrix variable. In this paper, we extend the concept of $s$-goodness for a sensing matrix in sparse signal recovery (proposed by Juditsky and Nemirovski [Math Program, 2011]) to linear transformations in LMR. Then, we give characterizations of $s$-goodness in the context of LMR. Using the two characteristic $s$-goodness constants, $γ_s$ and $\hatγ_s$, of a linear transformation, not only do we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for a linear transformation to be $s$-good, but also provide sufficient conditions for exact and stable $s$-rank matrix recovery via the nuclear norm minimization under mild assumptions. Moreover, we give computable upper bounds for one of the $s$-goodness characteristics which leads to verifiable sufficient conditions for exact low-rank matrix recovery.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.