Paper detail

Sudden and Steady Orbital Period Changes Across the Classical Nova Eruptions of DQ Her and BT Mon

I report two new measures of the sudden change in the orbital period ($P$) across the nova eruption ($Δ$P) and the steady period change in quiescence ($\dot{P}$) for classical novae (CNe) DQ Her and BT Mon. The fractional changes ($Δ$P/P) in parts-per-million (ppm) are $-$4.46$\pm$0.03 for DQ Her and +39.6$\pm$0.5 for BT Mon. For BT Mon, the $Δ$P/P value is not large enough (i.e., $>$1580 ppm) to allow for Hibernation in this system. The {\it negative} $Δ$P/P for DQ Her is a confident counterexample of the Hibernation model for the evolution of cataclysmic variables. Further, published models of period changes by nova eruptions do not allow for such a negative value, so some additional mechanism is required, with this perhaps being due to asymmetric ejection of material. My program has also measured the first long-term $\dot{P}$ for CNe, with 0.00$\pm$0.02 for DQ Her and $-$2.3$\pm$0.1 for BT Mon, all with units of $10^{-11}$ days/cycle. These can be directly compared to the predictions of the Magnetic Braking model, where the long-term average $\dot{P}$ is a single universal function of $P$. The predicted values are -0.027 for DQ Her and -0.33 for BT Mon. For both novae, the measured $\dot{P}$ is significantly far from the predictions for Magnetic Braking. Further, the observed $Δ$P for BT Mon imposes an additional {\it positive} period change of +0.60$\times$10$^{-11}$ days/cycle when averaged over the eruption cycle, so this system actually has a long-term {\it rise} in $P$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.