Paper detail

Sudden and Steady Orbital Period Changes Across Six Classical Nova Eruptions; The End of Hibernation and Two Serious Challenges for the Magnetic Braking Model of Cataclysmic Variable Evolution

I report on two new measures of the sudden change in the orbital period ($P$) across the nova eruption ($Δ$P) and the steady period change in quiescence ($\dot{P}$) for classical novae (CNe) RR Pic and HR Del, bringing a total of six such measures for CNe, all in a final report of my large and long observing program. The fractional changes ($Δ$P/P) in parts-per-million (ppm) are -290.71$\pm$0.28 (QZ Aur), -472.1$\pm$4.8 (HR Del), -4.46$\pm$0.03 (DQ Her), +39.6$\pm$0.5 (BT Mon), -2003.7$\pm$0.9 (RR Pic), and -273$\pm$61 (V1017 Sgr). These results are in stark opposition to the Hibernation Model for the evolution of cataclysmic variables (CVs), which requires $Δ$P/P$>$+1000 ppm to get the required drop in the accretion rate to produce hibernation. The Hibernation Model cannot be salvaged in any way. My program has also measured the first long-term $\dot{P}$ for classical novae, with -2.84$\pm$0.22 (QZ Aur), +4.0$\pm$0.9 (HR Del), +0.00$\pm$0.02 (DQ Her), -2.3$\pm$0.1 (BT Mon), and +1.25$\pm$0.01 (RR Pic) in units of $10^{-11}$ days/cycle. These can be directly compared to the predictions of the Magnetic Braking Model, where the long-term average $\dot{P}$ is a single universal function of $P$. The measured values are +5.3, $-$94, 0.00, +6.9, and $-$190 times that predicted by the model, so the predictions are always greatly wrong. Further, the effects of the $Δ$P averaged over the eruption cycle are usually much larger than the magnetic braking effects. To get a realistic model of CV evolution, we must add the physics of the $Δ$P and $\dot{P}$ variations.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.