Paper detail

Subword counting and the incidence algebra

The Pascal matrix, $P$, is an upper diagonal matrix whose entries are the binomial coefficients. In 1993 Call and Velleman demonstrated that it satisfies the beautiful relation $P=\exp(H)$ in which $H$ has the numbers 1, 2, 3, etc. on its superdiagonal and zeros elsewhere. We generalize this identity to the incidence algebras $I(A^*)$ and $I(\mathcal{S})$ of functions on words and permutations, respectively. In $I(A^*)$ the entries of $P$ and $H$ count subwords; in $I(\mathcal{S})$ they count permutation patterns. Inspired by vincular permutation patterns we define what it means for a subword to be restricted by an auxiliary index set $R$; this definition subsumes both factors and (scattered) subwords. We derive a theorem for words corresponding to the Reciprocity Theorem for patterns in permutations: Up to sign, the coefficients in the Mahler expansion of a function counting subwords restricted by the set $R$ is given by a function counting subwords restricted by the complementary set $R^c$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.