Paper detail

Substructures in protoplanetary disks imprinted by compact planetary systems

The substructures observed in protoplanetary disks may be the signposts of embedded planets carving gaps or creating vortices. The inferred masses of these planets often fall in the Jovian regime despite their low abundance compared to lower-mass planets, partly because previous works often assume that a single substructure (a gap or vortex) is caused by a single planet. In this work, we study the possible imprints of compact systems composed of Neptune-like planets ($\sim10-30\;M_\oplus$) and show that long-standing vortices are a prevalent outcome when their inter-planetary separation ($Δa$) falls below $\sim8$ times $H_{\rm p}$ -- the average disk's scale height at the planets locations. In simulations where a single planet is unable to produce long-lived vortices, two-planet systems can preserve them for at least $5,000$ orbits in two regimes: i) fully-shared density gaps with elongated vortices around the stable Lagrange points $L_4$ and $L_5$ for the most compact planet pairs ($Δa \lesssim 4.6\; H_{\rm p}$); ii) partially-shared gaps for more widely spaced planets ($Δa \sim 4.6 - 8\;H_{\rm p}$) forming vortices in a density ring between the planets through the Rossby wave instability. The latter case can produce vortices with a wide range of aspect ratios down to $\sim3$ and can occur for planets captured into the 3:2 (2:1) mean-motion resonances for disk's aspects ratios of $h\gtrsim 0.033$ ($h\gtrsim 0.057$). We suggest that their long lifetimes are sustained by the interaction of spiral density waves launched by the neighboring planets. Overall, our results show that distinguishing imprint of compact systems with Neptune-mass planets are long-lived vortices inside the density gaps, which in turn are shallower than single-planet gaps for a fixed gap width.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.