Paper detail

Substructures and Density Profiles of Clusters in Models of Galaxy Formation

In this paper we investigate, using high resolution N-body simulations, the density profiles and the morphologies of galaxy clusters in seven models of structure formation. We show that these properties of clusters are closely related to the occurrence of a significant merging event in the recent past. The seven models are: (1) the standard CDM model (SCDM) with $Ω_0 = 1$, $Λ_0=0$ and $h=0.5$; (2) a low-density flat model (FL03) with $Ω_0=0.3$, $Λ_0=0.7$ and $h=0.75$; (3) an open model (OP03) with $Ω_0=0.3$, $Λ_0=0$ and $h=0.75$; (4) a low-density flat model (FL02) with $Ω_0=0.2$, $Λ_0=0.8$ and $h=1$; (5) an open model (OP02) with $Ω_0=0.2$, $Λ_0=0$ and $h=1$; (6) a low-density flat model (FL01) with $Ω_0=0.1$ and $Λ_0=0.9$; (7) an open model (OP01) with $Ω_0=0.1$ and $Λ_0=0$. We find that the density profiles and morphologies of clusters depend both on $Ω_0$ and on $Λ_0$. For $Λ_0=0$, these properties are a monotonic function of $Ω_0$. Clusters in OP01 have the steepest density profiles, their density contours are the roundest and show the smallest center shifts. The other extreme case is SCDM, where clusters show the least steep density profiles and the most elongated contours. For a given $Ω_0$ ($<1$), clusters in the flat model (i.e. with $Λ_0=1-Ω_0$) have flatter density profiles and less substructures than in the corresponding open model. In particular, our results show that low-density flat models with $Ω_0\sim 0.3$, which are currently considered as a successful alternative to SCDM, can produce a substantial fraction of clusters with substructures. This is in contrast to the conception that this kind of models may have serious problem in this aspect.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.