Paper detail

Substructure in the stellar halo near the Sun. I. Data-driven clustering in Integrals of Motion space

Aims: Develop a data-driven and statistically based method for finding such clumps in Integrals of Motion space for nearby halo stars and evaluating their significance robustly. Methods: We use data from Gaia EDR3 extended with radial velocities from ground-based spectroscopic surveys to construct a sample of halo stars within 2.5 kpc from the Sun. We apply a hierarchical clustering method that uses the single linkage algorithm in a 3D space defined by the commonly used integrals of motion energy $E$, together with two components of the angular momentum, $L_z$ and $L_\perp$. To evaluate the statistical significance of the clusters found, we compare the density within an ellipsoidal region centered on the cluster to that of random sets with similar global dynamical properties. We pick out the signal at the location of their maximum statistical significance in the hierarchical tree. We estimate the proximity of a star to the cluster center using the Mahalanobis distance. We also apply the HDBSCAN clustering algorithm in velocity space. Results: Our procedure identifies 67 highly significant clusters ($ > 3σ$), containing 12\% of the sources in our halo set, and in total 232 subgroups or individual streams in velocity space. In total, 13.8\% of the stars in our data set can be confidently associated to a significant cluster based on their Mahalanobis distance. Inspection of our data set reveals a complex web of relationships between the significant clusters, suggesting that they can be tentatively grouped into at least 6 main structures, many of which can be associated to previously identified halo substructures, and a number of independent substructures. This preliminary conclusion is further explored in an accompanying paper by Ruiz-Lara et al., where we also characterize the substructures in terms of their stellar populations. Conclusions: We find... (abridged version)

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.