Paper detail

Substructure in the lens HE 0435-1223

We investigate the properties of dark matter substructure in the gravitational lens HE 0435-1223 (z_l=0.455) via its effects on the positions and flux ratios of the quadruply-imaged background quasar (z_s=1.689). We start with a smooth mass model, add individual, truncated isothermal clumps near the lensed images, and use the Bayesian evidence to compare the quality of different models. Compared with smooth models, models with at least one clump near image A are strongly favored. The mass of this clump within its Einstein radius is log(Mein/Msun) = 7.65 +0.87/-0.84. The Bayesian evidence provides weaker support for a second clump near image B, with log(Mein/Msun) = 6.55 +1.01/-1.51. We also examine models with a full population of substructure, and find the mass fraction in substructure at the Einstein radius to be f_sub > 0.00077, assuming the total clump masses follow a mass function dN/dM proportional to M^(-1.9) over the range M = 10^7-10^10 Msun. Few-clump and population models produce similar Bayesian evidence values, so neither type of model is objectively favored.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.