Paper detail

Subspace arrangements and Cherednik algebras

The purpose of this article is to study the relationship between numerical invariants of certain subspace arrangements coming from reflection groups and numerical invariants arising in the representation theory of Cherednik algebras. For instance, we observe that knowledge of the equivariant graded Betti numbers (in the sense of commutative algebra) of any irreducible representation in category O is equivalent to knowledge of the Kazhdan-Lusztig character of the irreducible object (we use this observation in joint work with Fishel-Manosalva). We then explore the extent to which Cherednik algebra techniques may be applied to ideals of linear subspace arrangements: we determine when the radical of the polynomial representation of the Cherednik algebra is a radical ideal, and, for the cyclotomic rational Cherednik algebra, determine the socle of the polynomial representation and characterize when it is a radical ideal. The subspace arrangements that arise include various generalizations of the k-equals arrangment. In the case of the radical, we apply our results with Juteau together with an idea of Etingof-Gorsky-Losev to observe that the quotient by the radical is Cohen-Macaulay for positive choices of parameters. In the case of the socle (in cyclotomic type), we give an explicit vector space basis in terms of certain specializations of non-symmetric Jack polynomials, which in particular determines its minimal generators and Hilbert series and answers a question posed by Feigin and Shramov.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.