Paper detail

Subsequence Matching and LCS under Cartesian-Tree Equivalence

Two strings of the same length are said to Cartesian-tree match (CT-match) if their Cartesian-trees are isomorphic [Park et al., TCS 2020]. Cartesian-tree matching is a natural model that allows for capturing similarities of numerical sequences. Oizumi et al. [CPM 2022] showed that subsequence pattern matching under CT-matching model (CT-MSeq) can be solved in $O(nm \log \log n)$ time, where $n$ and $m$ are text and pattern lengths, respectively. This current article follows this line of research, and gives the following new results: (1) An $O(nm)$-time CT-MSeq algorithm for binary alphabets; (2) An $O((nm)^{1-ε})$-time conditional lower bound for the CT-MSeq problem on alphabets of size 4, for any constant $ε> 0$, under the Orthogonal Vector Hypothesis (OVH). Further, we introduce the new problem of longest common subsequence under CT-matching (CT-LCS) for two given strings $S$ and $T$ of length $n$, and present the following results: (3) An $O(n^6)$-time CT-LCS algorithm for general ordered alphabets; (4) An $O(n^2 / \log n)$-time CT-LCS algorithm for binary alphabets; (5) An $O(n^{2-ε})$-time conditional lower bound for the CT-LCS problem on alphabets of size 5, for any constant $ε> 0$, under OVH.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.