Paper detail

Submodular Matroid Secretary Problem with Shortlists

In the matroid secretary problem, the elements of a matroid $\mathcal{M}$ arrive in random order. Once we observe an item we need to irrevocably decide whether or not to accept it. The set of selected elements should form an independent set of the matroid. The goal is to maximize the total sum of the values assigned to these elements. We introduce a version of this problem motivated by the shortlist model in [Agrawal et al.]. In this setting, the algorithm is allowed to choose a subset of items as part of a shortlist, possibly more than $k=rk(\mathcal{M})$ items. Then, after seeing the entire input, the algorithm can choose an independent subset from the shortlist. Furthermore we generalize the objective function to any monotone submodular function. Is there an online algorithm achieve a constant competitive ratio using a shortlist of size $O(k)$? We design an algorithm that achieves a $\frac{1}{2}(1-1/e^2-ε-O(1/k))$ competitive ratio for any constant $ε>0$, using a shortlist of size $O(k)$. This is especially surprising considering that the best known competitive ratio for the matroid secretary problem is $O(\log \log k)$. An important application of our algorithm is for the random order streaming of submodular functions. We show that our algorithm can be implemented in the streaming setting using $O(k)$ memory. It achieves a $\frac{1}{2}(1-1/e^2-ε-O(1/k))$ approximation. The previously best known approximation ratio for streaming submodular maximization under matroid constraint is 0.25 (adversarial order) due to [Feldman et al.], [Chekuri et al.], and [Chakrabarti et al.]. Moreover, we generalize our results to the case of p-matchoid constraints and give a $\frac{1}{p+1}(1-1/e^{p+1}-ε-O(1/k))$ approximation using $O(k)$ memory, which asymptotically approaches the best known offline guarantee $\frac{1}{p+1}$ [Nemhauser et al.]

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.