Paper detail

Submodular Function Maximization over Distributive and Integer Lattices

The problem of maximizing non-negative submodular functions has been studied extensively in the last few years. However, most papers consider submodular set functions. Recently, several advances have been made for the more general case of submodular functions on the integer lattice. In this paper, we present a deterministic $\frac{1}{3}$-approximation for maximizing a submodular function on a bounded integer lattice $\{0, \ldots, C\}^n$ using a Double Greedy framework. Moreover, we show that the analysis is tight and that other ideas used for approximating set functions cannot easily be extended. In contrast to set functions, submodularity on the integer lattice does not imply the so-called diminishing returns property. Assuming this property, it was shown that many results for set functions can also be obtained for the integer lattice. In this paper, we consider a further generalization. Instead of the integer lattice, we consider a distributive lattice as the function domain and assume the diminishing returns (DR) property. On the one hand, we show that some approximation algorithms match the set functions setting. In particular, we can obtain a $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation for unconstrained maximization, a $(1-\frac{1}{e})$-approximation for monotone functions under a cardinality constraint and a $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation for a poset matroid constraint. On the other hand, for a knapsack constraint, the problem becomes significantly harder: even for monotone DR-submodular functions, we show that there is no $2^{(\log (n^{1/2} - 1))^δ- 1}$-approximation for every $δ> 0$ under the assumption that $3-SAT$ cannot be solved in time $2^{n^{3/4 + ε}}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.