Paper detail

Submillimeter Number Counts at 250, 350 and 500 microns in BLAST data

BLAST (Balloon-borne Large-Aperture Submillimeter Telescope) performed the first deep and wide extragalactic survey at 250, 350 and 500 um. The extragalactic number counts at these wavelengths are important constraints for modeling the infrared galaxies evolution. [...] We use three methods to identify the submillimeter sources. 1) Blind extraction. [...] The photometry is computed with a new simple and quick PSF fitting routine (FASTPHOT). [...] 2) Extraction with prior. [...] 3) A stacking analysis. [...] With the blind extraction, we reach 97, 83 and 76 mJy at resp. 250, 350 and 500 um with a 95% completeness. With the prior extraction, we reach 76 mJy (resp. 63 and 49 mJy) at 250 um (resp. 350 and 500 um). With the stacking analysis, we reach 6.2 mJy (resp. 5.2 and 3.5 mJy) at 250 um (resp. 350 and 500 um). The differential submillimeter number counts are derived, and start showing a turnover at flux densities decreasing with increasing wavelength. There is a very good agreement with the P(D) analysis of Patanchon et al. (2009). At bright fluxes (>100 mJy), the Lagache et al. (2004) and Le Borgne et al. (2009) models slightly overestimate the observed counts, but there is a very good agreement near the peak of differential number counts. [...] Counts are available at: http://www.ias.u-psud.fr/irgalaxies/downloads.php

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.