Paper detail

Submilisecond acoustic pulses: effective pitch and Weber-Fechner law in discrimination of duration times

The enclosed tests demonstrate that an effective pitch can be attributed to acoustic signals shorter then tenths of milliseconds. A power-law dependence of this pitch on the signal's duration time is found for subjects tested with Gaussian pulses. The discrimination threshold for the pulse duration time reported on the basis of the effective pitch increases proportionally to the duration time itself, i.e. it follows the Weber-Fechner law. A model based on the "Helmholtz's harp" idea, i.e. a series of damped resonators tuned in the audible range of frequencies, reveals the mechanism of producing a maximum in the filtered spectrum of the pulse. This corroborates the power law in the dependence of the position of the maximum on the duration time of the pulse. The model indicates a possibility of designing a manmade device dedicated to determination of the durations so short that they are inaccessible by direct measurements.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.