Paper detail

Sublinearity of the number of semi-infinite branches for geometric random trees

The present paper addresses the following question: for a geometric random tree in $\R^{2}$, how many semi-infinite branches cross the circle $\CC_{r}$ centered at the origin and with a large radius $r$? We develop a method ensuring that the expectation of the number $χ_{r}$ of these semi-infinite branches is $o(r)$. The result follows from the fact that, far from the origin, the distribution of the tree is close to that of an appropriate directed forest which lacks bi-infinite paths. In order to illustrate its robustness, the method is applied to three different models: the Radial Poisson Tree (RPT), the Euclidean First-Passage Percolation (FPP) Tree and the Directed Last-Passage Percolation (LPP) Tree. Moreover, using a coalescence time estimate for the directed forest approximating the RPT, we show that for the RPT $χ_{r}$ is $o(r^{1-η})$, for any $0<η<1/4$, almost surely and in expectation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.