Paper detail

Subdominant Dark Matter sterile neutrino resonant production in the light of Planck

Few independent detections of a weak X-ray line at an energy of $\sim$3.5 keV seen toward a number of astrophysical sites have been reported. If this signal will be confirmed to be the signature of decaying DM sterile neutrino with a mass of ~7.1 keV, then the cosmological observables should be consistent with its properties. In this paper we make a coupled treatment of the weak decoupling, primordial nucleosynthesis and photon decoupling epochs in the sterile neutrino resonant production scenario, including the extra radiation energy density via N_eff. We compute the radiation and matter perturbations including the full resonance sweep solution for active-sterile flavor conversion in the expanding Universe. We show that the cosmological measurements are in agreement with sub-dominant DM sterile neutrino resonant production with following parameters (errors at 95 CL): sterile neutrino mass 6.08 \pm 3.22 keV, mixing angle \sin^2 2 θ< 5.61 x 10^{-10}, lepton number per flavor L_4 = 1.23 \pm 0.04 and sterile neutrino mass fraction f_ν< 0.078. Our results are in good agreement with the sterile neutrino resonant production parameters inferred in Ref. [62] from the linear large scale structure constraints to produce full Dark Matter density.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.