Paper detail

Subdiffusive heat-kernel decay in four-dimensional i.i.d. random conductance models

We study the diagonal heat-kernel decay for the four-dimensional nearest-neighbor random walk (on $\Z^4$) among i.i.d. random conductances that are positive, bounded from above but can have arbitrarily heavy tails at zero. It has been known that the quenched return probability $\cmss P_ω^{2n}(0,0)$ after $2n$ steps is at most $C(ω) n^{-2} \log n$, but the best lower bound till now has been $C(ω) n^{-2}$. Here we will show that the $\log n$ term marks a real phenomenon by constructing an environment, for each sequence $λ_n\to\infty$, such that $$ \cmss P_ω^{2n}(0,0)\ge C(ω)\log(n)n^{-2}/λ_n, $$ with $C(ω)>0$ a.s., along a deterministic subsequence of $n$'s. Notably, this holds simultaneously with a (non-degenerate) quenched invariance principle. As for the $d\ge5$ cases studied earlier, the source of the anomalous decay is a trapping phenomenon although the contribution is in this case collected from a whole range of spatial scales.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.