Paper detail

Subcritical $\mathcal{U}$-bootstrap percolation models have non-trivial phase transitions

We prove that there exist natural generalizations of the classical bootstrap percolation model on $\mathbb{Z}^2$ that have non-trivial critical probabilities, and moreover we characterize all homogeneous, local, monotone models with this property. Van Enter (in the case $d=r=2$) and Schonmann (for all $d \geq r \geq 2$) proved that $r$-neighbour bootstrap percolation models have trivial critical probabilities on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ for every choice of the parameters $d \geq r \geq 2$: that is, an initial set of density $p$ almost surely percolates $\mathbb{Z}^d$ for every $p>0$. These results effectively ended the study of bootstrap percolation on infinite lattices. Recently Bollobás, Smith and Uzzell introduced a broad class of percolation models called $\mathcal{U}$-bootstrap percolation, which includes $r$-neighbour bootstrap percolation as a special case. They divided two-dimensional $\mathcal{U}$-bootstrap percolation models into three classes -- subcritical, critical and supercritical -- and they proved that, like classical 2-neighbour bootstrap percolation, critical and supercritical $\mathcal{U}$-bootstrap percolation models have trivial critical probabilities on $\mathbb{Z}^2$. They left open the question as to what happens in the case of subcritical families. In this paper we answer that question: we show that every subcritical $\mathcal{U}$-bootstrap percolation model has a non-trivial critical probability on $\mathbb{Z}^2$. This is new except for a certain `degenerate' subclass of symmetric models that can be coupled from below with oriented site percolation. Our results re-open the study of critical probabilities in bootstrap percolation on infinite lattices, and they allow one to ask many questions of subcritical bootstrap percolation models that are typically asked of site or bond percolation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.